<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Education and Liberty &#187; Socratic Inquiry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://educationandliberty.com/category/socratic-inquiry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://educationandliberty.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 01:55:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why study liberal arts? Your answer.</title>
		<link>http://educationandliberty.com/2010/03/29/why-study-liberal-arts-your-answer/</link>
		<comments>http://educationandliberty.com/2010/03/29/why-study-liberal-arts-your-answer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 02:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socratic Inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santa Fe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socratic Dialogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Johns College]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationandliberty.com/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.collegefinancialaidguide.com/pictures/St.%20John%27s%20College/logo.jpg"></a></p> <p>St. Johns College President Christopher Nelson  recently gave an address about the value of a liberal arts education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education.</p> <p>If you have ever asked me why I went to St. Johns, what I think is so great about the liberal arts, or why I think that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.collegefinancialaidguide.com/pictures/St.%20John%27s%20College/logo.jpg"><img class="aligncenter" title="St Johns Logo" src="http://www.collegefinancialaidguide.com/pictures/St.%20John%27s%20College/logo.jpg" alt="" width="231" height="212" /></a></p>
<p>St. Johns College President Christopher Nelson  recently gave an address about the value of a liberal arts education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education.</p>
<p>If you have ever asked me why I went to St. Johns, what I think is so great about the liberal arts, or why I think that education is the only way to create real change, here is your answer:</p>
<blockquote><p>Our nation’s foundation rests upon the principle of the intellectual freedom of each of its citizens; its political, economic, moral and spiritual freedoms are all derived from this intellectual freedom, and its political, economic, moral and spiritual strength depends upon it.  We are a nation built upon a respect for the individual and a trust that our citizens are capable of self-government.</p>
<p>For the sake of our country, we therefore need our citizens to have an education in our democratic traditions and foundations, as well as in the arts needed to question and examine those very foundations so that we may keep them vibrant and alive for us against attack or atrophy.  There is a real tension between these two goods.  The traditions, customs and laws of the nation are at times at odds with the very things that encourage the autonomy of the individual citizen who might question them.  This tension is healthy in a free republic.</p>
<p>A college education that will strengthen this tension will serve this nation well because it will help us educate independent and self-sufficient citizens who will be fit for the freedom they enjoy in our country.  Providing the access and opportunity to as many as possible to undertake such an education will serve that public interest.</p>
<p>If we prize the individual in our society and value the ways an individual may become self-sufficient, we also ought to support the many and various means our colleges employ to help their students become independent and strong.  In the end, the independence of our citizenry will strengthen our nation.  Education in the arts of freedom and self-sufficiency make the promise of America possible[...]</p>
<p>We are sometimes asked whether we aren&#8217;t elitist.  One former dean&#8217;s answer to that was, &#8220;We are small, but we are about as exclusive as a pick-up baseball game.  If you have a glove, want to play and make an effort, you belong.&#8221;  It&#8217;s a particularly good image because it suggests something that is very all-American.  We are a model of an American institution in at least two respects:</p>
<p>◊ First, democratic participation is our primary mode in the classroom.  Our students are responsible for participating in their classes, all of them in the same way.  They must all read the books, and then they must learn to listen to the authors, listen to their classmates&#8217; contributions, and listen to themselves speaking.  They have equal responsibilities, equal rights and equal opportunities to learn according to their abilities, their desire and their preparedness for class.</p>
<p>◊ Second, all of our students read, and read critically, the principal documents that define our American democracy: the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution, the Federalist Papers, the great speeches of Washington and Lincoln, and certain key Supreme Court decisions.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the full speech <a href="http://www.sjca.edu/about/AN/speeches/harvardaddress.shtml">here</a>.</p>
<p>{I love my college.}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationandliberty.com/2010/03/29/why-study-liberal-arts-your-answer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meaningful Conversation &amp; Happiness</title>
		<link>http://educationandliberty.com/2010/03/18/meaningful-conversation-happiness/</link>
		<comments>http://educationandliberty.com/2010/03/18/meaningful-conversation-happiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socratic Inquiry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationandliberty.com/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;"> <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/papazimouris/2314463032/"></a>© Papazi Mouris, Flickr &#8220;greekadman&#8221;Creative Commons License <p style="text-align:center;">&#8220;Ideal conversation must be an exchange of thought, and not,<br /> as many of those who worry most about their shortcomings believe,<br /> an eloquent exhibition of wit or oratory&#8221;</p> ~Emily Post, American Etiquette Pioneer <p>A new study in the journal Psychological Science concluded [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:center;">
<h6 class="mceTemp mceIEcenter">
<dl class="wp-caption aligncenter">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/papazimouris/2314463032/"><img title="conversation b&amp;w" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3226/2314463032_fe6598bc08_m.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="160" /></a>© Papazi Mouris, Flickr &#8220;greekadman&#8221;Creative Commons License</dt>
</dl>
</h6>
<p style="text-align:center;">&#8220;Ideal conversation must be an exchange of thought, and not,<br />
as many of those who worry most about their shortcomings believe,<br />
an eloquent exhibition of wit or oratory&#8221;</p>
<h5 style="text-align:center;">~<em>Emily Post, American Etiquette Pioneer</em></h5>
<p>A new study in the journal Psychological Science concluded that happy people talk more, and have more substantive conversations. While this study solely reveals the correlation between happiness and conversation, not a causal link, I find it interesting that it is not mere conversation that the happy have, but substantive conversation.</p>
<p>If education is didactic and does not foster behaviors that allow for the clear and purposeful exchange of ones own ideas than there is no opportunity for the students to practice what the happiest people do: have meaningful fulfilling conversations!</p>
<p>See the links below for more information on the study:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.livescience.com/culture/happy-people-less-small-talk-100304.html">Happy People Talk More, and With More Substance</a></p>
<p><a title="Can you talk your way to happy?" href="http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyle/content/healthday/636726.html">Can You Talk Your Way to Happy?</a></p>
<p><a title="Substantive Talks" href="http://themedguru.com/20100306/newsfeature/substantive-talks-better-small-talks-happier-life-86132634.html">Substantive talks better than small talks for happier life</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationandliberty.com/2010/03/18/meaningful-conversation-happiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secondary Teacher Wanted</title>
		<link>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/05/17/secondary-teacher-wanted/</link>
		<comments>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/05/17/secondary-teacher-wanted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socratic Inquiry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationandliberty.com/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One of the women in my education masters program came up with the following advertisement to recruit secondary teachers after reading Phil Gang&#8217;s Rethinking Education.  She did it with a little tongue and cheek, but frankly, it&#8217;s spot on!</p> <p>“Secondary level teacher of &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;required, must have high self esteem, be intelligent, have a full extra [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the women in my education masters program came up with the following advertisement to recruit secondary teachers after reading Phil Gang&#8217;s <em>Rethinking Education</em>.  She did it with a little tongue and cheek, but frankly, it&#8217;s spot on!</p>
<blockquote><p>“Secondary level teacher of &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;required, must have high self esteem, be intelligent, have a full extra curricula life, be open minded, trustworthy, friendly, nice and have a good sense of humor.</p>
<p>Applicant must have empathy and respect for students, knowledge of developmental psychology, be versatile, flexible, and be able to facilitate and mediate in the classroom. They must have good listening skills, a belief in young people, and faith in the future of mankind.”</p></blockquote>
<p>How amazing.  She also expressed (and we at Education and Liberty all agree) that a &#8220;teacher&#8221; must be a life long learner.  She shared this great <a href="http://www.sideroad.com/Setting_and_Achieving_Goals/lifelong-learning.html">link</a> by an <a href="http://www.sideroad.com/consultants/Setting-and-Achieving-Goals-Consultant-kevin_eikenberry.html">organizational trouble-shooter, Kevin Eikenberry</a>, about the qualities of a life long learner.   The article talks about how we are all really in the business of learning, what that means, and how to get better at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/05/17/secondary-teacher-wanted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Innovation, Education, &amp; Progress: King, Hayek, &amp; Montessori</title>
		<link>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/04/23/innovation-education-progress-king-hayek-montessori/</link>
		<comments>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/04/23/innovation-education-progress-king-hayek-montessori/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classical Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneurship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montessori]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socratic Inquiry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationandliberty.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>“Human progress is neither automatic nor inevitable&#8230; Every step toward the goal of justice requires sacrifice, suffering, and struggle; the tireless exertions and passionate concern of dedicated individuals.” ~ Martin Luther King, Jr.</p> <p>We must make the building of a free society once more an intellectual adventure, a deed of courage… Unless we can make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>“Human progress is neither automatic nor inevitable&#8230; Every step toward the goal of justice requires sacrifice, suffering, and struggle; the tireless exertions and passionate concern of dedicated individuals.” ~ Martin Luther King, Jr.</em></p>
<p>W<em>e must make the building of a free society once more an intellectual adventure, a deed of courage… Unless we can make the philosophic foundations of a free society once more a living intellectual issue, and its implementation a task which challenges the ingenuity and imagination of our liveliest minds, the prospects of freedom are indeed dark. But if we can regain that belief in power of ideas which was the mark of [classical] liberalism at its best, the battle is not lost. ~F.A. Hayek, Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, p194 </em></p>
<p><em>If children are allowed free development and given occupation to correspond with their unfolding minds their<br />
natural goodness will shine forth. ~Maria Montessori</em></p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-175" title="Maria Montessori, F.A. Hayek, M.L. King" src="http://educationandliberty.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/thinkers.jpg" alt="Maria Montessori, F.A. Hayek, M.L. King" width="450" height="281" /></p>
<p>There are certain moments in my life where I feel like the world is telling me something. Times where so many of the conversations I have , ideas I am thinking about and articles I read converge,  that I can’t help but listen. This is one of those moments.</p>
<p>We all know that how we educate children needs to change, that the public school system is not  “working”. (I go further, and believe that it is inherently incapable of providing a truly valuable education that respects the individuality of the child.)</p>
<p>Most of the discussion of education has been negative statements, statements of what we don’t want. So what is the vision? What do we want out of education? What would be the very best outcome for society?</p>
<p>Now I don’t presume to know the Answer, but I will propose an answer (and I am curious to hear what you think!):  We want innovators. We want creative problem solvers, critical thinkers. That is where the continued progress and prosperity lies. We want people who see a problem, and are empowered to fix it, or at least give it an honest try. We want people who see a need, and want to fulfill it. We want entrepreneurs.  This call is universal. It goes beyond industry and sector, it reaches the very source of prosperity for all people, in all countries. A country of inspired innovators is a country of prosperous, perhaps even happy, people. The wonderful Maria Montessori said in chapter one of her book, The Absorbent Mind, “If help and salvation are to come, they can only come from the children, for the children are the makers of men.” The next question becomes what is the best way to develop the habits and insights of those “makers of men.” How do we inspire that wonderful quality of “tireless exertions and passionate concern of dedicated individuals.”? Again, I do not presume to know the Answer. It is and always will be an evolving process but I have some ideas&#8230;</p>
<p>My current work is inspiring. I am honored to be in the company of a man working towards this: my boss, Jeff Sandefer, is an entrepreneur who, in addition to his many other contributions towards the cause of liberty, is making huge strides in how we approach higher education. The Pope Center for Higher Education put out <a title="The Ivory Tower: Crumbling From Within?" href="http://www.popecenter.org/clarion_call/article.html?id=2161">an excellent article today </a>regarding his prediction of the collapse of the US higher education system. As I work with him to develop a primary school curriculum we are making progress towards changing the very model of elementary education. Exciting times.</p>
<p><a href="http://homepage.mac.com/matt_patterson/iMovieTheater3.html">Here </a>you will find an excellent speech that he gave on education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/04/23/innovation-education-progress-king-hayek-montessori/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Socratic Practice and the Development of Reason</title>
		<link>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/03/18/socratic-practice-and-the-development-of-reason/</link>
		<comments>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/03/18/socratic-practice-and-the-development-of-reason/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Classical Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socratic Inquiry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationandliberty.com/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"><a href="http://www.theatlasphere.com/columns/080709-strong-socratic-practice.php">This </a>is a great article by Michael Strong.  In it, Michael talks about how Socratic practice helps develop student’s rational abilities and helps make rational, tolerant discourse a cultural norm.  </p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;">Michael actually has a column on <a href="http://www.theatlasphere.com/columns/090313-strong-innovation-education.php">this website</a>.  </p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"> </p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"> </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"><span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;"><a href="http://www.theatlasphere.com/columns/080709-strong-socratic-practice.php">This </a>is a great article by Michael Strong.<span>  </span>In it, Michael talks about how Socratic practice helps develop student’s rational abilities and helps make rational, tolerant discourse a cultural norm. <span> </span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"><span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;"></span></span><span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman;">Michael actually has a column on <a href="http://www.theatlasphere.com/columns/090313-strong-innovation-education.php">this website</a>.<span>  </span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"><span style="font-size:small;font-family:Times New Roman;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0;"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/03/18/socratic-practice-and-the-development-of-reason/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Wonder-Full Life</title>
		<link>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/02/25/a-wonder-full-life/</link>
		<comments>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/02/25/a-wonder-full-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Austrian Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classical Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montessori]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socratic Inquiry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationandliberty.com/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>“If the idea of the universe is presented to the child in the right way, it will do more for him than just arouse his interest, for it will create in him admiration and wonder, a feeling loftier than any interest and more satisfying.” ~Maria Montessori</p> <p>&#8220;We are perishing for want of wonder, not for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“<em>If the idea of the universe is presented to the child in the right way, it will do more for him than just arouse his interest, for it will create in him admiration and wonder, a feeling loftier than any interest and more satisfying.” </em>~Maria Montessori</p>
<p><em>&#8220;We are perishing for want of wonder, not for want of wonders.&#8221;</em> ~G. K. Chesterton, quoted by Leonard Read, in <em>I, Pencil. </em></p>
<p>Last night I had an amazing conversation with my incredibly precocious 12 year old neighbor. Our conversation brought us to the idea of being self-sufficient, and what I would, or wouldn’t be able to do without the help of others. I was inspired to bring out <a title="I, Pencil" href="http://www.econlib.org/library/Essays/rdPncl1.html">I, Pencil,</a> a short essay by Leonard Read, founder of the<a title="FEE" href="http://fee.org/"> Foundation for Economic Education</a>, and read it with him. I went and got a pencil, simple, yellow, out of my desk, and we sat down together.</p>
<p><em>“I, Pencil, am a complex combination of miracles: a tree, zinc, copper, graphite, and so on. But to these miracles which manifest themselves in Nature an even more extraordinary miracle has been added: the configuration of creative human energies—millions of tiny know-hows configurating naturally and spontaneously in response to human necessity and desire and in the absence of any human master-minding! Since only God can make a tree, I insist that only God could make me. Man can no more direct these millions of know-hows to bring me into being than he can put molecules together to create a tree.” I, Pencil, </em>Leonard Read</p>
<p>If you have never read <a title="I, Pencil" href="http://www.econlib.org/library/Essays/rdPncl1.html">this essay</a>, I highly recommend it, I especially recommend reading it with your younger friends. My neighbor became so engaged! He began thinking of all the different people involved, and how we really aren’t very self sufficient at all. If we can inspire young people to see the wonder in the world around them, not just in nature, but in their own clothes, and plates, and pencils, in the simple things we can take for granted…if we can do that, we can begin to engage them to appreciate the “millions of tiny know-hows”, and once they appreciate them they will be prepared to protect them.</p>
<p>2-minute video of Milton Friedman paraphrasing the I, Pencil story (the essay is better, of course <img src='http://educationandliberty.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
<p>[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6vjrzUplWU] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/02/25/a-wonder-full-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aristotle, Montessori, and Baby-Talk&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/02/18/aristotle-montessori-and-baby-talk/</link>
		<comments>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/02/18/aristotle-montessori-and-baby-talk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montessori]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socratic Inquiry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationandliberty.wordpress.com/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Good habits formed at youth make all the difference. ~Aristotle</p> <p>The &#8216;absorbent mind&#8217; welcomes everything, puts hope in everything&#8230;adopts any religion, and the prejudices and the habits of its countrymen, incarnating all in itself. That is the child! ~Maria Montessori</p> <p>Nature says copy your parents&#8230;whatever your interests are, the child gets tremendously interested in them [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><span class="body">Good habits formed at youth make all the difference.</span> <strong>~</strong></em><strong><em>Aristotle</em></strong></p>
<p><em><span class="body">The &#8216;absorbent mind&#8217; welcomes everything, puts hope in everything&#8230;adopts any religion, and the prejudices and the habits of its countrymen, incarnating all in itself. That is the child! <strong>~Maria Montessori</strong></span></em></p>
<p><span class="body"><em>Nature says copy your parents&#8230;whatever your interests are, the child gets tremendously interested in them too. </em><em><strong>~Margaret Homfray, below video, 08:50</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span class="body"><em><strong><br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p>As I was researching Montessori principles, I came across some wonderful full-length lectures, by a plain speaking Montessorian named Margaret Homfray. This one on preparing children to read is particularly good.</p>
<p>[googlevideo=http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4642441267249144773&amp;ei=LTecSd-WDJy4qAO35vHCDA&amp;q=Margaret+Homfray+1]</p>
<p>If our goal is to educate children to become free thinking adults then we need think about how to they develop the habits of thought. We have to be aware of the role each of us has in fostering the habits of dialogue. If we never speak to children like they are thinking beings, if we never model sophisticated language and thought for them, children will never become comfortable thinking about sophisticated ideas.  Then, how can they enjoy the wonderfully complex ideas that we value?</p>
<p>When was the last time you had a conversation with a child? Asked them an open-ended question? It is amazing. They are so eager to talk to you, eager to tell you what they are thinking, what they like, what they don&#8217;t, what they have done with their day. Children see adults talking to one another all the time, and when you make the smallest effort to engage them, they tell you all about themselves. Each of us making these small efforts are what create the culture we strive for.</p>
<p>And you don&#8217;t have to wait until you have your own child to begin fostering a culture of dialogue. Try it with the next child you are standing with in the grodery store line, or on the bus.  Let me know what you learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/02/18/aristotle-montessori-and-baby-talk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Need for Moral Autonomy</title>
		<link>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/02/14/the-need-for-moral-autonomy/</link>
		<comments>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/02/14/the-need-for-moral-autonomy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socratic Inquiry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationandliberty.wordpress.com/2009/02/14/the-need-for-moral-autonomy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have been reading Ayn Rand’s essay “Philosophy: Who Needs It” again recently. This is an excellent and accessible essay that almost everyone would enjoy. In it, Rand sets out to explain why everyone needs philosophy.</p> <p>One of the main points of the essay is that every one of us is already possessed of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been reading Ayn Rand’s essay “Philosophy: Who Needs It” again recently.  This is an excellent and accessible essay that almost everyone would enjoy.  In it, Rand sets out to explain why everyone needs philosophy.</p>
<p>One of the main points of the essay is that every one of us is already possessed of a philosophy.  It is impossible to avoid using abstract ideas to integrate our concrete experiences.  We do not have a choice.</p>
<p>“Your only choice is whether you define your philosophy by a conscious, rational, disciplined process of thought and scrupulously logical deliberations—or let your subconscious accumulate a junk heap of unwarranted conclusions, false generalizations, undefined contradictions, undigested slogans, unidentified wishes, doubts and fears, thrown together by chance, but integrated by your subconscious into a kind of mongrel philosophy and fused into a single, solid weight: self doubt…”</p>
<p>This passage was particularly striking:</p>
<p>“When men abandon reason, they find not only that their emotions cannot guide them, but that they can experience no emotions save one: terror.  The spread of drug addiction among young people brought up on today’s intellectual fashions, demonstrates the unbearable inner state of men who are deprived of their means of cognition and who seek escape from reality—from the terror of their impotence to deal with existence.  Observe these young people’s dread of independence and their frantic desire to “belong,” to attach themselves to some group, clique or gang.  Most of them have never heard of philosophy, but they sense that they need some fundamental answers to questions they dare not ask—and they hope that the tribe will tell them how to live.  They are ready to be taken over by any witch doctor, guru, or dictator.  One of the most dangerous things a man can do is to surrender his moral autonomy to others”</p>
<p>I highly recommend this essay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/02/14/the-need-for-moral-autonomy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mill’s Utilitarianism Misunderstood?</title>
		<link>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/02/10/mill%e2%80%99s-utilitarianism-misunderstood/</link>
		<comments>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/02/10/mill%e2%80%99s-utilitarianism-misunderstood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socratic Inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tolerance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://educationandliberty.wordpress.com/2009/02/10/mill%e2%80%99s-utilitarianism-misunderstood/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I have a number of very intelligent and eager students who meet with me after school for various intellectual clubs. (There is Philosophy on Mondays, Logos, a math and logic club, on Wednesdays, and Debate on Thursdays. I also facilitate the Socrates Café in Houston on a Sunday once a month and Benjamin Cohen-Kurzrock, one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a number of very intelligent and eager students who meet with me after school for various intellectual clubs. (There is Philosophy on Mondays, Logos, a math and logic club, on Wednesdays, and Debate on Thursdays. I also facilitate the Socrates Café in Houston on a Sunday once a month and Benjamin Cohen-Kurzrock, one of the other authors on this blog, runs another group called the Dynamist Roundtable once a week dedicated to the Austrian school of economics.)</p>
<p>In the Philosophy group at the moment, we are reading a long excerpt from John Stuart Mill’s <em>Utilitarianism</em>. In it, Mill states the basic assumption of Utilitarianism is “that pleasure and freedom from pain are the only things desirable as ends; and that all desirable things (which are as numerous in the utilitarian as in any other scheme) are desirable either for the pleasure inherent in themselves, or as means to the promotion of pleasure and the prevention of pain”.</p>
<p>In response to the charge that Mill is advocating mere bodily pleasure as the highest goal for man, he protests that “it is quite compatible with the principle of utility to recognize the fact that some kinds of pleasure are more desirable and more valuable than others”. In fact, he states, “human beings have faculties more elevated than the animal appetites and, when once made conscious of them, do not regard anything as happiness which does not include their gratification.”</p>
<p>Mill is also famous for saying that “it is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied. And if the fool, or the pig, is of a different opinion, it is because they only know their own side of the question. The other party to the comparison knows both sides.”</p>
<p>Is Mill arguing that there are things that are desirable by nature to all human beings as human beings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://educationandliberty.com/2009/02/10/mill%e2%80%99s-utilitarianism-misunderstood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

